| Title |
„Stay and play“ im Fußball
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Unfallchirurgie, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00113-018-0487-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Werner Krutsch, Klaus Eder, Volker Krutsch, Tim Meyer |
| Abstract |
Many publications about the treatment and return to play after severe football injuries are available from the scientific literature, particularly about injuries requiring surgery. In contrast, less severe football injuries, such as muscle strains, ankle sprains and contusions, are less well addressed in the literature although these represent the most frequent type of injury. Additionally, such reports often have a low level of evidence and guidelines on treatment and the return to play process are very rare. Thus, the time away from football and the timing of return to play after minor injuries depends on the experience and skills of the responsible medical team. To achieve the aim of stay and play on the field, the medical team should be highly knowledgeable in interdisciplinary football medicine, prevention strategies, first aid on the field, clinical and manual diagnostics, tissue regeneration, symptomatic and conservative treatment as well as in return to play decision-making. No consensus exists on stay and play procedures neither on the practical level nor on the scientific level regarding injury definition, the diagnostic and treatment options and stay and play criteria. Therefore, this article presents the first steps for assessing stay and play strategies after minor injuries to standardize and improve practical routine, education and scientific research. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#439
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,997
of 343,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.