↓ Skip to main content

A laboratory investigation of interactions between denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation (DAMO) and anammox processes in anoxic environments

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A laboratory investigation of interactions between denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation (DAMO) and anammox processes in anoxic environments
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep08706
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shihu Hu, Raymond J. Zeng, Mohamed F. Haroon, Jurg Keller, Paul A. Lant, Gene W. Tyson, Zhiguo Yuan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 153 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 28%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 19%
Engineering 19 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,122,261
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#47,958
of 123,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,518
of 256,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#480
of 1,272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.