↓ Skip to main content

Thrombocyte counts in mice after the administration of papaya leaf suspension

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Medica Austriaca, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thrombocyte counts in mice after the administration of papaya leaf suspension
Published in
Acta Medica Austriaca, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00508-009-1229-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathiresan Sathasivam, Surash Ramanathan, Sharif M. Mansor, Mas Rosemal M. H. Haris, Walther H. Wernsdorfer

Abstract

Following up a popular use of crude leaf preparations from Carica papaya for the treatment of dengue infections, a suspension of powdered Carica papaya leaves in palm oil has been investigated for its effect on thrombocyte counts in mice, administering by gavage 15 mg of powdered leaves per kg body weight to 5 mice. Equal numbers of animals received corresponding volumes of either palm oil alone or physiological saline solution. Thrombocyte counts before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dosing revealed significantly higher mean counts at 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12 after dosing with the C. papaya leaf formulation as compared to the mean count at hour 0. There was only a non-significant rise of thrombocyte counts in the group having received saline solution, possibly the expression of a normal circadian rhythm in mice. The group having received palm oil only showed a protracted increase of platelet counts that was significant at hours 8 and 48 and obviously the result of a hitherto unknown stimulation of thrombocyte release. The results call for a dose-response investigation and for extending the studies to the isolation and identification of the C. papaya substances responsible for the release and/or production of thrombocytes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 87 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 10%
Chemistry 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,484,714
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#515
of 973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,456
of 106,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.