↓ Skip to main content

Search for blood or water is influenced by Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ricinus

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Search for blood or water is influenced by Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ricinus
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-014-0526-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Coralie Herrmann, Lise Gern

Abstract

An increasing number of studies suggest that vector-borne parasites are able to alter phenotypic traits in their arthropod vectors so that microorganism transmission is enhanced. This review documents this phenomenon, which occurs between Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria, the causative agents of Lyme borreliosis, and their tick vectors belonging to the Ixodes ricinus complex. It also reviews the influence of other tick-borne pathogens on these ticks. Ticks belonging to the Ixodes ricinus complex benefit from Borrelia infection by an increased lifespan (more fat and more resistance to desiccation) and by an increased questing period (less need to move to the litter zone to rehydrate), which enhances tick chances to find a host and to subsequently transmit the pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 18 17%
Professor 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,447
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,737
of 358,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#83
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.