You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reporting and Replicating Trials of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circoutcomes.114.001381 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bridget Abell, Paul Glasziou, Tammy Hoffmann |
| Abstract |
Complete reporting of all components of complex interventions is essential for translation of research evidence into clinical practice. Previous work has highlighted deficiencies in the reporting of nonpharmacological interventions; however, the reporting quality of exercise-based interventions for coronary heart disease has not been examined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| Norway | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,322,774
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#835
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,221
of 271,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.