You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Policy, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.003 |
| Authors |
Megan C. Evans, Josie Carwardine, Rod J. Fensham, Don W. Butler, Kerrie A. Wilson, Hugh P. Possingham, Tara G. Martin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 9% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 63 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 97 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#901,886
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Policy
#131
of 2,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,651
of 281,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Policy
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.