↓ Skip to main content

Anesthetized by chloroform before hanging

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Anesthetized by chloroform before hanging
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-9974-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amal Nishantha Vadysinghe, Murugaphillai Sivasubramanium

Abstract

We present a unique case of suicidal hanging. The deceased was a 31-year-old male who was found hanging from a tree in a dense thicket, with his lower limbs in contact with the ground (partial suspension). There was an apparatus similar to a facial mask placed around his nose and mouth. A strong chemical smell was emanating from the apparatus, which was identified as chloroform (Formyl trichloride/CHCl3). A ligature with a soft cloth beneath it was around his neck. A ligature mark was present around the neck. The decedent's blood alcohol levels were 112 mg/dl. The blood and stomach contents were negative for chloroform. A complete death investigation, including scene investigation and complete autopsy examination, confirmed the cause of death as hanging. The manner of death was suicide. This case highlights how the deceased had used several methods whilst committing suicide to minimize pain, including the inhalation of chloroform, which would have also resulted in the inability to engage in protective actions during the act.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,907,830
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#339
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,352
of 300,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.