You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomised controlled study of the long-term effects of exercise training on mortality in elderly people: study protocol for the Generation 100 study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007519 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorthe Stensvold, Hallgeir Viken, Øivind Rognmo, Eirik Skogvoll, Sigurd Steinshamn, Lars J Vatten, Jeff S Coombes, Sigmund A Anderssen, Jon Magnussen, Jan Erik Ingebrigtsen, Maria A Fiatarone Singh, Arnulf Langhammer, Asbjørn Støylen, Jorunn L Helbostad, Ulrik Wisløff |
| Abstract |
Epidemiological studies suggest that exercise has a tremendous preventative effect on morbidity and premature death, but these findings need to be confirmed by randomised trials. Generation 100 is a randomised, controlled study where the primary aim is to evaluate the effects of 5 years of exercise training on mortality in an elderly population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Canada | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 57% |
| Scientists | 11 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#723,988
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,225
of 25,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,638
of 368,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#17
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.