You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp15x683941 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Freda Mold, Simon de Lusignan, Aziz Sheikh, Azeem Majeed, Jeremy C Wyatt, Tom Quinn, Mary Cavill, Christina Franco, Umesh Chauhan, Hannah Blakey, Neha Kataria, Theodoros N Arvanitis, Beverley Ellis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 42% |
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 329 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 75 | 22% |
| Unknown | 66 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 72 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,391,004
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#653
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,089
of 274,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.