You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomised control trial of short term efficacy of in-shoe foot orthoses compared with a wait and see policy for anterior knee pain and the role of foot mobility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090204 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Mills, Peter Blanch, Priya Dev, Michael Martin, Bill Vicenzino |
| Abstract |
To investigate the short-term clinical efficacy of in-shoe foot orthoses over a wait-and-see policy in the treatment of anterior knee pain (AKP) and evaluate the ability of foot posture measures to predict outcome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| United States | 6 | 21% |
| Australia | 4 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,107,847
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#1,931
of 6,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,972
of 130,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#11
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.