↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic needle-assisted inguinal hernia repair in 495 children

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic needle-assisted inguinal hernia repair in 495 children
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3739-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren McClain, Christian Streck, Aaron Lesher, Robert Cina, Andre Hebra

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia repair in children has been a controversial topic for pediatric surgeons. Our method for inguinal hernia repair using laparoscopic techniques has comparable outcomes to the standard open technique. We describe our technique and experience with the laparoscopic needle-assisted repair of inguinal hernia (LNAR). We report 502 cases (710 hernias) from 2009 to 2013 by 3 surgeons. We reviewed our prospectively collected outcomes database of all patients receiving LNAR from 1/2009 to 3/2013. 502 cases in 495 patients <13 years old with 710 inguinal hernias were identified for analysis and review. Hernia repair is accomplished with a single-port needle-assisted technique. After identification of a patent processus vaginalis, the internal ring is encircled in an extraperitoneal plane using a 22G-Touhy needle for placement of a purse-string suture, tied extracorporally, and buried beneath the skin. The technique was standardized for all cases. 710 inguinal hernias were laparoscopically repaired in 495 patients (408 boys and 87 girls) age range 11 days to 12.8 years (mean 29.2 months; median 15.5 months). 294 patients had unilateral repair (199R and 95L) and 208 had bilateral repair. Mean operating time for unilateral was 20.5 min, and bilateral was 26.4 min. 21 minor complications were identified (9 superficial wound infections, 8 suture granulomas, and 4 recurrent hydroceles) and 4 recurrences. Mean time since surgery is 30 months (3-54 months). Mean follow-up was 10.7 months (0.3-38.4 months). Post-operative data show our technique is safe with a 4 % rate of minor complication. Recurrence rate was 0.56 % for the total number of hernias (4/710). This recurrence rate is comparable and in many cases less than open technique. Furthermore, laparoscopy objectively identifies asymptomatic or occult contralateral defect, uses a smaller incision, and eliminates dissection of the cord structures potentially reducing the risk of cord injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 13 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 58%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,749,774
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,372
of 6,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,493
of 230,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#90
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.