You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nonpharmacologic Interventions to Heal Pressure Ulcers in Older Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (The SENATOR-ONTOP Series)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, Isabel Lozano-Montoya, Iosief Abraha, Antonio Cherubini, Roy L. Soiza, Denis O'Mahony, Beatriz Montero-Errasquín, Alfonso J. Cruz-Jentoft |
| Abstract |
Pressure ulcers (PUs) are more frequent in older patients, and the healing process is usually challenging. Nonpharmacologic interventions may play a role in the treatment of older people with PUs, but most systematic reviews (SRs) have not addressed this specific population using convincing outcome measures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 25% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 18% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,987,498
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#753
of 3,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,754
of 270,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#15
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.