| Title |
Relative Importance Analysis: A Useful Supplement to Regression Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business and Psychology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3 |
| Authors |
Scott Tonidandel, James M. LeBreton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Norway | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 639 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 591 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 171 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 11% |
| Researcher | 68 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 121 | 19% |
| Unknown | 107 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 155 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 112 | 18% |
| Engineering | 40 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 133 | 21% |
| Unknown | 129 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,397,856
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#131
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,874
of 195,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them