↓ Skip to main content

Micropropagation of Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal: A Critically Endangered Medicinal Herb

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Micropropagation of Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal: A Critically Endangered Medicinal Herb
Published in
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/bf03263330
Authors

Rohit Jain, Arunima Sinha, Sumita Kachhwaha, S. L. Kothari

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Postgraduate 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,325,572
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#69
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,461
of 110,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them