↓ Skip to main content

Copromicroscopic and molecular investigations on intestinal parasites in kenneled dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Copromicroscopic and molecular investigations on intestinal parasites in kenneled dogs
Published in
Parasitology Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4385-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia Simonato, Antonio Frangipane di Regalbono, Rudi Cassini, Donato Traversa, Paola Beraldo, Cinzia Tessarin, Mario Pietrobelli

Abstract

Intestinal parasites are common in dogs worldwide, and their importance has recently increased for a renewed awareness on the public health relevance that some of them have. In this study, the prevalence of helminths and protozoa was evaluated by microscopy in 318 canine faecal samples collected from eight rescue shelters in the North-eastern Italy; 285 of them were also submitted to the molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. isolates. An analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence rates in relation to canine individual data, shelter provenance and anthelmintic treatments. Overall, 52.5 % (167/318) of faecal samples were positive for at least one parasite. Trichuris vulpis showed the highest overall prevalence rate (29.2 %), followed by G. duodenalis (15.1 %), Toxocara canis (9.7 %), ancylostomatids (8.2 %) and Cystoisospora (5.7 %). The prevalence of G. duodenalis, evaluated by real-time PCR, was 57.9 % (165/285), and 79 isolates were characterized by nested PCR on the β-giardin gene. The assemblages found were mainly the host-specific genotypes C and D, while only one assemblage was identified as the human-specific genotype B1. Isolates of Cryptosporidium spp., recorded in 3/285 (1.1 %) stool samples, were Cryptosporidium parvum based on the characterization of the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein (COWP) gene. Although the results describe a relatively limited risk of dog-originating zoonoses, there is the need to improve the quality of shelter practices towards better health managements for safe pet-adoption campaigns and a minimization of the environmental faecal pollution with canine intestinal parasites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,263,155
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#2,879
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,987
of 255,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#62
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.