↓ Skip to main content

Expanding whole exome resequencing into non-human primates

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Expanding whole exome resequencing into non-human primates
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r87
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric J Vallender

Abstract

Complete exome resequencing has the power to greatly expand our understanding of non-human primate genomes. This includes both a better appreciation of the variation that exists in non-human primate model species, but also an improved annotation of their genomes. By developing an understanding of the variation between individuals, non-human primate models of human disease can be better developed. This effort is hindered largely by the lack of comprehensive information on specific non-human primate genetic variation and the costs of generating these data. If the tools that have been developed in humans for complete exome resequencing can be applied to closely related non-human primate species, then these difficulties can be circumvented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 8%
India 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 103 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Student > Master 7 6%
Professor 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 4 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 8 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,269
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,575
of 137,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#43
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.