↓ Skip to main content

High purity microfluidic sorting and analysis of circulating tumor cells: towards routine mutation detection

Overview of attention for article published in Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High purity microfluidic sorting and analysis of circulating tumor cells: towards routine mutation detection
Published in
Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c5lc00104h
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Autebert, Benoit Coudert, Jérôme Champ, Laure Saias, Ezgi Tulukcuoglu Guneri, Ronald Lebofsky, François-Clément Bidard, Jean-Yves Pierga, Françoise Farace, Stéphanie Descroix, Laurent Malaquin, Jean-Louis Viovy

Abstract

A new generation of the Ephesia cell capture technology optimized for CTC capture and genetic analysis is presented, characterized in depth and compared with the CellSearch system as a reference. This technology uses magnetic particles bearing tumour-cell specific EpCAM antibodies, self-assembled in a regular array in a microfluidic flow cell. 48 000 high aspect-ratio columns are generated using a magnetic field in a high throughput (>3 ml h(-1)) device and act as sieves to specifically capture the cells of interest through antibody-antigen interactions. Using this device optimized for CTC capture and analysis, we demonstrated the capture of epithelial cells with capture efficiency above 90% for concentrations as low as a few cells per ml. We showed the high specificity of capture with only 0.26% of non-epithelial cells captured for concentrations above 10 million cells per ml. We investigated the capture behavior of cells in the device, and correlated the cell attachment rate with the EpCAM expression on the cell membranes for six different cell lines. We developed and characterized a two-step blood processing method to allow for rapid processing of 10 ml blood tubes in less than 4 hours, and showed a capture rate of 70% for as low as 25 cells spiked in 10 ml blood tubes, with less than 100 contaminating hematopoietic cells. Using this device and procedure, we validated our system on patient samples using an automated cell immunostaining procedure and a semi-automated cell counting method. Our device captured CTCs in 75% of metastatic prostate cancer patients and 80% of metastatic breast cancer patients, and showed similar or better results than the CellSearch device in 10 out of 13 samples. Finally, we demonstrated the possibility of detecting cancer-related PIK3CA gene mutation in 20 cells captured in the chip with a good correlation between the cell count and the quantitation value Cq of the post-capture qPCR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 5 5%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 31 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 18%
Chemistry 14 13%
Physics and Astronomy 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,297,977
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#2,695
of 5,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,253
of 359,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#195
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.