| Title |
Clinical evaluation study of the German network of disorders of sex development (DSD)/intersexuality: study design, description of the study population, and data quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anke Lux, Siegfried Kropf, Eva Kleinemeier, Martina Jürgensen, Ute Thyen, The DSD Network Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 21% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 97% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 32% |
| Psychology | 20 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,172,872
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,306
of 17,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,939
of 107,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.