↓ Skip to main content

Adverse feedback sequences in exploited marine systems: are deliberate interruptive actions warranted?

Overview of attention for article published in Fish & Fisheries, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adverse feedback sequences in exploited marine systems: are deliberate interruptive actions warranted?
Published in
Fish & Fisheries, November 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00229.x
Authors

Andrew Bakun, Scarla J. Weeks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Namibia 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 167 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 21%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 54%
Environmental Science 35 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,659,861
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Fish & Fisheries
#478
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,894
of 91,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fish & Fisheries
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them