| Title |
Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-015-3275-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama, Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni, Bo Dalsgaard, Ivan Sazima, Marlies Sazima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,804,483
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,165
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,784
of 258,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#46
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.