↓ Skip to main content

Computer use and physical inactivity in young adults: Public health perils and potentials of new information technologies1, 2

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Computer use and physical inactivity in young adults: Public health perils and potentials of new information technologies1, 2
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/bf02895662
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Fotheringham, Rebecca L. Wonnacott, Nevile Owen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Australia 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iraq 1 <1%
Unknown 103 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Sports and Recreations 11 10%
Computer Science 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,415,132
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#596
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,965
of 198,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.