↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics and motivations of volunteers providing one-to-one support for people with mental illness: a survey in Austria

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Characteristics and motivations of volunteers providing one-to-one support for people with mental illness: a survey in Austria
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00127-018-1514-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gϋnter Klug, Sarah Toner, Karin Fabisch, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

Large numbers of volunteers provide one-to-one support for people with mental illness, sometimes referred to as befriending. However, there has been very little research on their characteristics and motivations. This study aimed to assess the personal characteristics and motivations of such volunteers across different regions in Austria. Questionnaires assessing characteristics and motivations were distributed to 663 volunteers providing befriending for people with mental illness within volunteering programmes organised in four Austrian regions. Questionnaires were completed and returned by 360 out of 663 approached volunteers (response rate 54%). Whilst most socio-demographic characteristics were widely distributed, 78% were female; 42% reported to have a family member and 56% a friend with a mental illness. Most volunteers cited motivations to do something both for others (e.g. "feel a responsibility to help others") and for themselves (e.g. "enhance my awareness of mental health issues"). When the total group was divided into four subgroups in a cluster analysis based on their socio-demographic characteristics, a subgroup of female, single and younger volunteers in full-time employment expressed motivations to achieve something for themselves significantly more often than other subgroups. The study provides the largest sample of volunteers in befriending programmes for people with mental illness in the research literature to date. The findings suggest that people with different characteristics can be recruited to volunteer for befriending programmes. Recruitment strategies and supervision arrangements should consider motivations both to help others and to achieve something for themselves, and may be varied for specific volunteer subgroups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 21%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,060,545
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1,215
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,944
of 330,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.