Title |
Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Osamu Itano, Go Oshima, Takuya Minagawa, Masahiro Shinoda, Minoru Kitago, Yuta Abe, Taizo Hibi, Hiroshi Yagi, Naruhiko Ikoma, Satoshi Aiko, Miho Kawaida, Yohei Masugi, Kaori Kameyama, Michiie Sakamoto, Yuko Kitagawa |
Abstract |
This study evaluated our new strategy for treating suspected T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) using a laparoscopic approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 22% |
Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2015.
All research outputs
#13,937,024
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,088
of 6,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,637
of 257,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#36
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.