You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 Promotes Adoptive T-Cell Immunotherapy in a Tolerogenic Environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0119483 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen J. P. Blake, Alan L. H. Ching, Tony J. Kenna, Ryan Galea, Justin Large, Hideo Yagita, Raymond J. Steptoe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
| Researcher | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,962,646
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,911
of 196,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,706
of 258,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,029
of 5,368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.