↓ Skip to main content

Population-based assessment of the outcomes in patients with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population-based assessment of the outcomes in patients with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers
Published in
Gut, March 2015
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308578
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anand Govindarajan, Linda Rabeneck, Lingsong Yun, Jill Tinmouth, Lawrence F Paszat, Nancy N Baxter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,429,348
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#5,208
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,572
of 258,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#48
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.