| Title |
Confirmation in the Cognitive Sciences: The Problematic Case of Bayesian Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minds and Machines, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11023-011-9241-3 |
| Authors |
Frederick Eberhardt, David Danks |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 31% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 28 | 31% |
| Philosophy | 16 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 17% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2011.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#63
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,670
of 114,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them