You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of age on long-term outcomes after a routine invasive or selective invasive strategy in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative analysis of individual data from the FRISC II - ICTUS - RITA-3 (FIR) trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heart, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300453 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Damman, Tim Clayton, Lars Wallentin, Bo Lagerqvist, Keith A A Fox, Alexander Hirsch, Fons Windhausen, Eva Swahn, Stuart J Pocock, Jan G P Tijssen, Robbert J de Winter |
| Abstract |
To perform a patient-pooled analysis of a routine invasive versus a selective invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 26% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 66% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,656,246
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#4,116
of 5,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,093
of 130,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#26
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.