↓ Skip to main content

Long-term hearing results of stapedotomy: analysis of factors affecting outcome

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Long-term hearing results of stapedotomy: analysis of factors affecting outcome
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00405-018-4899-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingeborg Dhooge, Stéphanie Desmedt, Thomas Maly, David Loose, Helen Van Hoecke

Abstract

To evaluate long-term hearing results of stapedotomy and analyze the influence of patient-, disease-, and procedure-related variables. Retrospective case series. Tertiary referral center. 230 ears (202 patients, 10-74 years) underwent stapedotomy for otosclerosis between January 2008 and August 2014. All cases had early postoperative follow-up (4 weeks post-surgery) and 181 cases had late postoperative follow-up (≥ 1 year, average 32.5 months). Stapedotomy procedure for otosclerosis. Hearing outcome using conventional audiometry. The primary outcome parameter was the postoperative air-bone gap pure-tone average. Postoperative air-bone gap ≤ 10 dB was defined as surgical success. Preoperative, early postoperative and late postoperative hearing results were compared. Influence of patient- and procedure-related variables on hearing outcome was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. The postoperative air-bone gap was 10 dB or less in 77.0% of cases early post-surgery and in 70.7% of cases in long-term follow-up. Air-bone gap closure within 20 dB was obtained in 95.7 and 92.3%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a larger preoperative air-bone gap (p = 0.041) and positive family history of otosclerosis (p = 0.044) were predictive for less surgical success early postoperatively, but not on the long term. Age, gender, primary versus revision surgery, presence of preoperative tinnitus and preoperative vertigo did not independently and significantly influence postoperative air-bone gap closure. Our series confirms excellent hearing results achieved in stapedotomy surgery, also in long-term follow-up. On the long-term no patient-, disease-, or procedure-related variables were identified as predictors of surgical success.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 17 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 20 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,669
of 3,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,247
of 336,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#21
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.