| Title |
Characterization and modelling of the hydrophobic domain of a sunflower oleosin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004250100655 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucille G. Alexander, Richard B. Sessions, Anthony R. Clarke, Arthur S. Tatham, Peter R. Shewry, Johnathan A. Napier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Professor | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 37% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,211,265
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#575
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,438
of 123,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.