| Title |
Mindfulness based cognitive therapy may improve emotional processing in bipolar disorder: pilot ERP and HRV study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metabolic Brain Disease, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11011-013-9462-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fleur M. Howells, H. G. Laurie Rauch, Victoria L. Ives-Deliperi, Neil R. Horn, Dan J. Stein |
| Abstract |
Emotional processing in bipolar disorder (BD) is impaired. We aimed to measure the effects of mindfulness based cognitive-behavioral therapy (MBCT) in BD on emotional processing, as measured by event related potentials (ERP) and by heart rate variability (HRV). ERP and HRV were recorded during the completion of a visual matching task, which included object matching, affect matching, and affect labeling. Individuals with BD (n = 12) were compared with controls (n = 9) to obtain baseline data prior to the individuals with BD undergoing an 8-week MBCT intervention. ERP and HRV recording was repeated after the MBCT intervention in BD. Participants with BD had exaggerated ERP N170 amplitude and increased HRV HF peak compared to controls, particularly during the affect matching condition. After an 8-week MBCT intervention, participants with BD showed attenuation of ERP N170 amplitude and reduced HRV HF peak. Our findings support findings from the literature emphasizing that emotional processing in BD is altered, and suggesting that MBCT may improve emotional processing in BD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 50 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 100 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,402,666
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Metabolic Brain Disease
#707
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,722
of 306,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolic Brain Disease
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.