↓ Skip to main content

Four Gaucher disease type II patients with three novel mutations: a single centre experience from Turkey

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolic Brain Disease, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Four Gaucher disease type II patients with three novel mutations: a single centre experience from Turkey
Published in
Metabolic Brain Disease, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11011-018-0236-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatma Derya Bulut, Deniz Kör, Berna Şeker-Yılmaz, Özlem Hergüner, Serdar Ceylaner, Ferda Özkınay, Sebile Kılavuz, Neslihan Önenli-Mungan

Abstract

Gaucher disease is the most common lysosomal storage disorder due to glucosylceramidase enzyme deficiency. There are three subtypes of the disease. Neurological involvement accompanies visceral and haematological findings only in type II and type III Gaucher patients. Type II is the acute progressive neuronopathic form which is the most severe and rare subtype. Clinical findings are recognized prenatally or in the first months of life and followed by death within the first two years of age. Among our 81 Gaucher patients, we identified 4 (4,9%) type II patients in our metabolic centre. This rate is significantly higher than the rate reported in the literature (<1%). Three of the patients had novel mutations, one of them was a collodion baby and the other one was mistyped as type III due to its atypical presentation at the beginning and he was treated with ERT for 8 months. In this report, we present our type II Gaucher patients with three novel mutations and one perinatal lethal form with generalized ichthyosis which is a very rare disorder. Additionally, we would like to highlight the phenotypic heterogeneity not only between the subtypes, also even in the same type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,609,025
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Metabolic Brain Disease
#516
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,916
of 331,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolic Brain Disease
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.