↓ Skip to main content

The ethics of “primo non nocere”, professional responsibility and shared decision making in high-stakes neurosurgery

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
The ethics of “primo non nocere”, professional responsibility and shared decision making in high-stakes neurosurgery
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00701-015-2384-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Munthe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,448,296
of 24,457,696 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#403
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,657
of 263,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.