| Title |
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5102-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Djillali Annane, Roman Jaeschke, Gordon Guyatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 18% |
| Canada | 13 | 12% |
| United States | 13 | 12% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 60% |
| Scientists | 28 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 27% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#585,657
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#541
of 5,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,770
of 324,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#19
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.