↓ Skip to main content

Marrow Adiposity and Hematopoiesis in Aging and Obesity: Exercise as an Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Current Osteoporosis Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Marrow Adiposity and Hematopoiesis in Aging and Obesity: Exercise as an Intervention
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11914-018-0424-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vihitaben S. Patel, M. Ete Chan, Janet Rubin, Clinton T. Rubin

Abstract

Changes in the bone marrow microenvironment, which accompany aging and obesity, including increased marrow adiposity, can compromise hematopoiesis. Here, we review deleterious shifts in molecular, cellular, and tissue activity and consider the potential of exercise to slow degenerative changes associated with aging and obesity. While bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) are increased in frequency and myeloid-biased with age, the effect of obesity on HSC proliferation and differentiation remains controversial. HSC from both aged and obese environment have reduced hematopoietic reconstitution capacity following bone marrow transplant. Increased marrow adiposity affects HSC function, causing upregulation of myelopoiesis and downregulation of lymphopoiesis. Exercise, in contrast, can reduce marrow adiposity and restore hematopoiesis. The impact of marrow adiposity on hematopoiesis is determined mainly through correlations. Mechanistic studies are needed to determine a causative relationship between marrow adiposity and declines in hematopoiesis, which could aid in developing treatments for conditions that arise from disruptions in the marrow microenvironment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 30 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#404
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,754
of 330,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.