↓ Skip to main content

Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13415-018-0594-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nash Unsworth, Matthew K. Robison

Abstract

In four experiments, the association between arousal state and different mind-wandering states was examined. Participants performed a sustained attention task while pupil responses were continuously recorded. Periodically during the task, participants were presented with thought probes to determine if they were on task or mind wandering. Across the four experiments, the results suggested that in situations that promoted on-task behaviors and focused external attention, mind wandering was associated with lowered arousal, as seen by smaller tonic pupil diameters and smaller phasic pupillary responses. However, in situations that promoted a more internal focus of attention, there were no differences between on-task states and mind wandering in tonic pupil diameter (although differences emerged for phasic pupillary responses), suggesting similar arousal levels. Furthermore, across the four experiments, mind blanking and mind wandering dissociated in terms of whether the situation promoted focused external attention or focused internal attention. These results are broadly consistent with the notion that mind wandering is a heterogeneous construct, with different forms of mind wandering being associated with different arousal states, and suggest that a combination of behavioral and pupillary measures can be used to track these various states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 23%
Student > Master 20 12%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 46 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 42%
Neuroscience 18 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 54 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,148,516
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#145
of 987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,650
of 333,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.