↓ Skip to main content

Neurological Complications of Acute and Chronic Otitis Media

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 920)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Neurological Complications of Acute and Chronic Otitis Media
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11910-018-0817-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Hutz, Dennis M. Moore, Andrew J. Hotaling

Abstract

The aim of this study is to discuss the symptoms, diagnosis, and management of the neurologic complications of acute and chronic otitis media. Antibiotic therapy has greatly reduced the frequency of complications of otitis media. However, it is of vital importance to remain aware of the possible development of neurologic complications. There is a trend toward less severe presenting symptoms including otorrhea, headache, nausea, and fever, with altered mental status and focal neurologic deficits presenting later. In order to reduce morbidity, early deployment of a multidisciplinary approach with prompt imaging and laboratory studies is imperative to guide appropriate management. Complications of acute and chronic otitis media may present with neurologic signs and symptoms. It is important to recognize the possible otitic origin of such complications to ensure proper management and to decrease overall morbidity and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Linguistics 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#763,223
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#19
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,894
of 446,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.