↓ Skip to main content

Costs of dispersal

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1014 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1255 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costs of dispersal
Published in
Biological Reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00201.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dries Bonte, Hans Van Dyck, James M. Bullock, Aurélie Coulon, Maria Delgado, Melanie Gibbs, Valerie Lehouck, Erik Matthysen, Karin Mustin, Marjo Saastamoinen, Nicolas Schtickzelle, Virginie M. Stevens, Sofie Vandewoestijne, Michel Baguette, Kamil Barton, Tim G. Benton, Audrey Chaput‐Bardy, Jean Clobert, Calvin Dytham, Thomas Hovestadt, Christoph M. Meier, Steve C. F. Palmer, Camille Turlure, Justin M. J. Travis

Abstract

Dispersal costs can be classified into energetic, time, risk and opportunity costs and may be levied directly or deferred during departure, transfer and settlement. They may equally be incurred during life stages before the actual dispersal event through investments in special morphologies. Because costs will eventually determine the performance of dispersing individuals and the evolution of dispersal, we here provide an extensive review on the different cost types that occur during dispersal in a wide array of organisms, ranging from micro-organisms to plants, invertebrates and vertebrates. In general, costs of transfer have been more widely documented in actively dispersing organisms, in contrast to a greater focus on costs during departure and settlement in plants and animals with a passive transfer phase. Costs related to the development of specific dispersal attributes appear to be much more prominent than previously accepted. Because costs induce trade-offs, they give rise to covariation between dispersal and other life-history traits at different scales of organismal organisation. The consequences of (i) the presence and magnitude of different costs during different phases of the dispersal process, and (ii) their internal organisation through covariation with other life-history traits, are synthesised with respect to potential consequences for species conservation and the need for development of a new generation of spatial simulation models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 22 2%
Unknown 1180 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 299 24%
Researcher 208 17%
Student > Master 193 15%
Student > Bachelor 130 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 5%
Other 194 15%
Unknown 169 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 716 57%
Environmental Science 206 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 2%
Engineering 8 <1%
Other 54 4%
Unknown 225 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,310,807
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#332
of 1,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,651
of 145,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.