| Title |
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine in 2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12952-015-0025-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bjorn R Olsen, Bent Brachvogel |
| Abstract |
A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editor-in-Chief and Managing Editor of the journal warmly thank the reviewers whose comments helped to shape Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine, for their invaluable assistance with review of manuscripts for the journal in Volume 13 (2014). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,264,045
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#102
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,212
of 258,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.