↓ Skip to main content

Securement Methods for Peripheral Venous Catheters to Prevent Failure: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Vascular Access, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Securement Methods for Peripheral Venous Catheters to Prevent Failure: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial
Published in
The Journal of Vascular Access, April 2015
DOI 10.5301/jva.5000348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Marsh, Joan Webster, Julie Flynn, Gabor Mihala, Barbara Hewer, John Fraser, Claire M. Rickard

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of four securement methods to prevent peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 30 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,588,266
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Vascular Access
#67
of 656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,595
of 263,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Vascular Access
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.