↓ Skip to main content

Deprescribing

Overview of attention for article published in Internal Medicine Journal, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deprescribing
Published in
Internal Medicine Journal, March 2015
DOI 10.1111/imj.12693
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. A. Scott, D. G. Le Couteur

Abstract

Inappropriate polypharmacy and its associated harm pose a significant threat to older patients. The prescribing decisions of physicians greatly influence what other practitioners prescribe. Minimising medication-related harm requires physicians to adopt a systematic approach to the deliberate and judicious deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medicines in at-risk individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,210,508
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine Journal
#285
of 2,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,527
of 261,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine Journal
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.