↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiological and clinical outcome comparison of indirect (‘strain’) versus direct (‘contusion’) anterior and posterior thigh muscle injuries in male elite football players: UEFA Elite League study…

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiological and clinical outcome comparison of indirect (‘strain’) versus direct (‘contusion’) anterior and posterior thigh muscle injuries in male elite football players: UEFA Elite League study of 2287 thigh injuries (2001–2013)
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Ueblacker, Hans-Wilhelm Müller-Wohlfahrt, Jan Ekstrand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cyprus 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 235 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 17%
Student > Master 34 14%
Other 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 26%
Sports and Recreations 58 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 75 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,455,902
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#4,442
of 6,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,217
of 258,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#75
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.