| Title |
Integrating Support Persons into Diabetes Telemonitoring to Improve Self-Management and Medication Adherence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3101-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James E. Aikens, Ranak Trivedi, David C. Aron, John D. Piette |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefits for medication adherence of integrating a patient-selected support person into an automated diabetes telemonitoring and self-management program, and to determine whether these benefits vary by patients' baseline level of psychological distress. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,494,469
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,876
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,609
of 368,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#37
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.