↓ Skip to main content

National campaigns to improve antibiotic use

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
National campaigns to improve antibiotic use
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00228-005-0094-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Herman Goossens, Didier Guillemot, Matus Ferech, Benoit Schlemmer, Michiel Costers, Marije van Breda, Lee J. Baker, Otto Cars, Peter G. Davey

Abstract

High levels of antibiotic consumption are driving levels of bacterial resistance that threaten public health. Nonetheless, antibiotics still provide highly effective treatments for common diseases with important implications for human health. The challenge for public education is to achieve a meaningful reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use without adversely affecting the management of bacterial infections. This paper focuses on the lessons learned from national campaigns in countries (Belgium and France) with high antibiotic use. Evaluation of these national campaigns showed the importance of television advertising as a powerful medium to change attitudes and perhaps also behaviour with regard to antibiotics. Moreover, in both countries, strong evidence suggested reduced antibiotic prescribing. However, adverse effects associated with a reduction in antibiotic prescribing were not monitored. We conclude that carefully designed mass education campaigns could improve antibiotic use nationally and should be considered in countries with high antibiotic use. However, these campaigns should employ techniques of social marketing and use appropriate outcome measures. The benefits and risks of such campaigns have been less well established in countries where antibiotic use is already low or declining.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Faroe Islands 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 151 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Other 11 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 42 26%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,037,215
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#243
of 2,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,934
of 80,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.