You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantitative gene profiling of long noncoding RNAs with targeted RNA sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3321 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael B Clark, Tim R Mercer, Giovanni Bussotti, Tommaso Leonardi, Katelin R Haynes, Joanna Crawford, Marion E Brunck, Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Gethin P Thomas, Wendy Y Chen, Ryan J Taft, Lars K Nielsen, Anton J Enright, John S Mattick, Marcel E Dinger |
| Abstract |
We compared quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), RNA-seq and capture sequencing (CaptureSeq) in terms of their ability to assemble and quantify long noncoding RNAs and novel coding exons across 20 human tissues. CaptureSeq was superior for the detection and quantification of genes with low expression, showed little technical variation and accurately measured differential expression. This approach expands and refines previous annotations and simultaneously generates an expression atlas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 318 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 90 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 5% |
| Professor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 151 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 97 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#599,603
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#790
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,952
of 260,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#23
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.