↓ Skip to main content

Survival histories of marsupial carnivores on Australian continental shelf islands highlight climate change and Europeans as likely extirpation factors: implications for island predator restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Survival histories of marsupial carnivores on Australian continental shelf islands highlight climate change and Europeans as likely extirpation factors: implications for island predator restoration
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10531-018-1546-6
Authors

David E. Peacock, Bronwyn A. Fancourt, Matthew C. McDowell, Ian Abbott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 42%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,658,302
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#984
of 2,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,288
of 300,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.