↓ Skip to main content

Social Media in Disaster Risk Reduction and Crisis Management

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
419 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
917 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Social Media in Disaster Risk Reduction and Crisis Management
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11948-013-9502-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

David E. Alexander

Abstract

This paper reviews the actual and potential use of social media in emergency, disaster and crisis situations. This is a field that has generated intense interest. It is characterised by a burgeoning but small and very recent literature. In the emergencies field, social media (blogs, messaging, sites such as Facebook, wikis and so on) are used in seven different ways: listening to public debate, monitoring situations, extending emergency response and management, crowd-sourcing and collaborative development, creating social cohesion, furthering causes (including charitable donation) and enhancing research. Appreciation of the positive side of social media is balanced by their potential for negative developments, such as disseminating rumours, undermining authority and promoting terrorist acts. This leads to an examination of the ethics of social media usage in crisis situations. Despite some clearly identifiable risks, for example regarding the violation of privacy, it appears that public consensus on ethics will tend to override unscrupulous attempts to subvert the media. Moreover, social media are a robust means of exposing corruption and malpractice. In synthesis, the widespread adoption and use of social media by members of the public throughout the world heralds a new age in which it is imperative that emergency managers adapt their working practices to the challenge and potential of this development. At the same time, they must heed the ethical warnings and ensure that social media are not abused or misused when crises and emergencies occur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 917 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 910 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 191 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 145 16%
Student > Bachelor 73 8%
Researcher 66 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 5%
Other 166 18%
Unknown 226 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 178 19%
Computer Science 96 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 73 8%
Engineering 69 8%
Environmental Science 49 5%
Other 193 21%
Unknown 259 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,101,302
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#71
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,337
of 316,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.