You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prediction Models for Neonatal Health Care–Associated Sepsis: A Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatrics, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1542/peds.2014-3226 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evelien Hilde Verstraete, Koen Blot, Ludo Mahieu, Dirk Vogelaers, Stijn Blot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 24% |
| Unknown | 49 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,946,311
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#7,507
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,190
of 267,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#110
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.