↓ Skip to main content

Equine Herpesvirus‐1 Consensus Statement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Equine Herpesvirus‐1 Consensus Statement
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, May 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0304.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

D.P. Lunn, N. Davis‐Poynter, M.J.B.F. Flaminio, D.W. Horohov, K. Osterrieder, N. Pusterla, H.G.G. Townsend

Abstract

Equine herpesvirus-1 is a highly prevalent and frequently pathogenic infection of equids. The most serious clinical consequences of infection are abortion and equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy (EHM). In recent years, there has been an apparent increase in the incidence of EHM in North America, with serious consequences for horses and the horse industry. This consensus statement draws together current knowledge in the areas of pathogenesis, strain variation, epidemiology, diagnostic testing, vaccination, outbreak prevention and control, and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 13%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 72 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 56 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,399,686
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
#87
of 3,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,830
of 101,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.