↓ Skip to main content

The origin of interstitial myofibroblasts in chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The origin of interstitial myofibroblasts in chronic kidney disease
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00467-011-1772-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivica Grgic, Jeremy S. Duffield, Benjamin D. Humphreys

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,963
of 4,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,260
of 202,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.