↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Autophagy Affects the Prognosis of Mice with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Regulation of Autophagy Affects the Prognosis of Mice with Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10620-018-5053-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianhua Wan, Jie Chen, Dangyan Wu, Xiaoyu Yang, Yaobin Ouyang, Yin Zhu, Liang Xia, Nonghua Lu

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common inflammatory disease that may develop to severe AP (SAP), resulting in life-threatening complications. Impaired autophagic flux is a characteristic of early AP, and its accumulation could activate oxidative stress and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathways, which aggravate the disease process. To explore the therapeutic effects of regulating autophagy after the onset of AP. In this study, intraperitoneal injections of 3-methyladenine (3-MA) and rapamycin (RAPA) in the L-arginine or cerulein plus lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Balb/C mouse model. At 24 h after the last injection, pulmonary, intestinal, renal and pancreatic tissues were analyzed. We found that 3-MA ameliorated systemic organ injury in two SAP models. 3-MA treatment impaired autophagic flux and alleviated inflammatory activation by modulating the NF-κB signaling pathway and the caspase-1-IL-1β pathway, thus decreasing the injuries to the organs and the levels of inflammatory cytokines. Our study found that the regulation of autophagy could alter the progression of AP induced by L-arginine or cerulein plus LPS in mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,172,769
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2,920
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,640
of 332,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#48
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.